俱舍論記 5.232

5.232

「又異語文至皆不應理」者，上別破名，此別破文。一即顯體莫知、二即例同名破。但以文替名為異，餘義皆同，准釋可解。

On "Moreover, a phoneme distinct from speech... is wholly unreasonable": the above separately refuted words; this separately refutes phonemes. First, it shows that their substantial entity is unknowable; second, it refutes them by analogy with the refutation of words. It differs only in substituting "phoneme" for "word"; the remaining senses are identical, and can be understood by following the same explanation.