俱舍論記 6.65

6.65

「如是作文至前釋為善」者，論主評取前解。如是作文獲何功德？唯顯《發智論》主非善於文，是故應知前三因釋於理為善。由斯理故，因答無時非因，緣答未至已生。論主若作此解，非以《婆沙》評家為正。

"In composing the text in this way... the former explanation is superior": the author evaluates and adopts the former explanation. What virtue is gained by composing the text in this way? It only shows that the author of the Jñānaprasthāna was not skilled in phrasing. Therefore, one should know that the former explanation based on the three causes is superior in reason. By this reasoning, the cause was answered with "at no time is it not a cause," and the condition was answered with "not until it has already arisen." In proposing this explanation, the author of the treatise does not take the arbitrating opinion of the Mahāvibhāṣā as correct.