俱舍論疏 10.104
俱舍論疏 10.104
- Language
- Classical Chinese
10.104
論「若於觸後至俱起受想思」,有部以經部不信本論,與出違經過也。經言三和俱起受、想、思,如何說觸、受時別也?
On the Śāstra's statement: "If after contact ... feeling, ideation, and volition co-arise": because the Sautrāntika does not believe in the fundamental treatise, the Sarvāstivādin adduces the fallacy of contradicting the sūtras. The sūtra states that in the union of the three, feeling, ideation, and volition co-arise; how can you say that contact and feeling belong to different times?
Translations (1)
- English (machine translation) — English, machine translation