俱舍論疏 10.58

10.58

論「無如是失至差別而說」，有部救也。無有如是重說法處之失，法處有多種故。有是受、愛及觸，復更有餘不相應等眾多法處。經說六外處者，說餘法處。經說六受說受、經說六愛說愛、經說六觸說觸，由此說法處已更說六受、六愛、六觸。汝宗離觸無別有三，可觸及三差別而說。

The treatise says: "There is no such fault [...] and are stated distinctively." This is the Sarvāstivādin's defense. There is no such fault of restating the dharmāyatana, because the dharmāyatana has many varieties. There are feeling, craving, and contact, and furthermore there are many other dharmāyatanas such as non-associated formations. When the sūtra states the six external āyatanas, it states the remaining dharmāyatanas. When the sūtra states the six feelings, it states feeling; when the sūtra states the six cravings, it states craving; when the sūtra states the six contacts, it states contact. Therefore, having stated the dharmāyatana, it further states the six feelings, six cravings, and six contacts. In your school, apart from contact there are no distinct three, so how could contact and the three be stated distinctively?