俱舍論疏 13.76

13.76

論「無如是過至以性鈍故」，經部釋也。此欲散無表思之差別，與定無表義意不同。欲散無表，由二思力之所引發動作思既名表業，發身、語表故。此熏於心成其種子，名為無表。定心無表即不如是，由彼同時心力起故，名心隨轉。如有部宗，從其表業發生無表，亦由發表業思之所引發，非是表色，色性鈍故。

On the Śāstra's statement: "There is no such error [... to ...] because its nature is dull": The Sautrāntikas explain. This non-intimation of the desire realm's distraction is a differentiation of intention, and its meaning differs from non-intimation of absorption. The non-intimation of the desire realm's distraction is induced by the power of the two intentions; since actuating intention is called intimation karma, it gives rise to bodily and vocal intimation. This perfuses the mind to form its seeds, which is called non-intimation. Non-intimation of the absorbed mind is not like this: because it arises by the power of the concurrent mind, it is called operating in accordance with the mind. Just as in the Sarvāstivādin school, the non-intimation arising from intimation karma is also induced by the intention that produces intimation karma, and is not [due to] intimation form, because the nature of form is dull.