俱舍論疏 13.76

13.76

On the Śāstra's statement: "There is no such error [... to ...] because its nature is dull": The Sautrāntikas explain. This non-intimation of the desire realm's distraction is a differentiation of intention, and its meaning differs from non-intimation of absorption. The non-intimation of the desire realm's distraction is induced by the power of the two intentions; since actuating intention is called intimation karma, it gives rise to bodily and vocal intimation. This perfuses the mind to form its seeds, which is called non-intimation. Non-intimation of the absorbed mind is not like this: because it arises by the power of the concurrent mind, it is called operating in accordance with the mind. Just as in the Sarvāstivādin school, the non-intimation arising from intimation karma is also induced by the intention that produces intimation karma, and is not [due to] intimation form, because the nature of form is dull.