俱舍論疏 19.181

19.181

論「雖法、類智至非欲三所緣」，釋伏難也。難云：若互為因，邪見即緣類智、法智亦互為因，何故欲界邪見唯緣法智，上界邪見唯緣類智？答云：雖法、類智品道亦互相因，而類智品道不治欲界故，類智品道非欲三所緣。

On the Śāstra's: "Although dharma-knowledge and subsequent knowledge... they are not the objects of the three [defilements] of the desire realm," this explains an implicit objection. The objection says: If they mutually act as causes, and false view conditions them accordingly, subsequent knowledge and dharma-knowledge also mutually act as causes; why does the false view of the desire realm condition only dharma-knowledge, while the false view of the higher realms conditions only subsequent knowledge? The reply states: Although the paths belonging to the categories of dharma-knowledge and subsequent knowledge also mutually act as causes, because the paths of subsequent knowledge do not remedy the desire realm, the paths of subsequent knowledge are not the objects of the three [defilements] of the desire realm.