俱舍論疏 19.34

19.34

論「或經於得至立苦等想」，第二釋經也。火體非苦，以能生苦假立苦名。隨眠之得雖非隨眠，得隨眠故，經於彼得假立隨眠。斷貪之時名正遣除，并得斷故，云并隨眠斷。

Regarding the treatise from "Or the sūtra, with respect to possession... up to... establishes the notion of suffering, etc.", this is the second explanation of the sūtra. The substance of fire is not suffering, yet because it can produce suffering, the name 'suffering' is metaphorically applied to it. Although the possession (prāpti) of anuśaya is not the anuśaya, because it possesses anuśaya, the sūtra metaphorically applies the name anuśaya to that possession. At the time when greed is abandoned, it is called 'correctly eliminated', and because the possession is abandoned along with it, it says 'abandoned together with the anuśaya'.