俱舍論疏 29.155

29.155

論「謂若有識至定非眼識所了」，又以所緣緣難。色是眼識所緣緣，眼識能了色，我非眼識所緣緣，但是因眼識知者，如何眼識能了於我？

The treatise says: "That is to say, if there is a consciousness... it is definitely not cognized by the visual consciousness." This also refutes [them] by way of the objective condition (ālambana-pratyaya). Visible form is the objective condition of the visual consciousness; the visual consciousness can cognize visible form. The self is not the objective condition of the visual consciousness; it is merely known by cause of the visual consciousness. How then could the visual consciousness cognize the self?