俱舍論疏 29.164

29.164

論「非此中說至無違前失」，論主通經也。經說六根行處、境界各有差別，各別樂求自所行處及自境界者，非此中說眼等六根，但說眼等增上勢力所引意識名眼等六根。所以者何？眼等五根及所生識，無有勢力樂見等故。樂見等者，是五識後意識，獨行意識不能樂求眼等五根所行境界故，故作是說六根行處境各別也。無違前說五根各取自境界失。

The treatise says: "It is not said here... there is no fault of contradicting what was said before." The author of the treatise clarifies the sūtra. When the sūtra states that the spheres of activity and domains of the six faculties are each distinct, each distinctly seeking its own sphere of activity and its own domain, it does not mean the six faculties such as the eye here; it merely speaks of the mental consciousness induced by the dominant power of the eye and the other faculties, calling it the six faculties such as the eye. Why is this? The five faculties such as the eye and the consciousnesses produced from them do not have the power to take delight in seeing and so forth. That which takes delight in seeing and so forth is the mental consciousness following the five consciousnesses. Because an independently functioning mental consciousness cannot seek the domains traversed by the five faculties such as the eye, it is therefore said that the spheres of activity and domains of the six faculties are distinct. There is no fault of contradicting what was said before, namely that the five faculties each grasp their own domain.