俱舍論疏 3.34

3.34

論「若增上故至增上用故」，論主假立賓、主釋難。於中有二：一假設難、二正通難。就難之中，先舉自宗難、次舉數論難。此即先舉自宗難也。《正理論》云「若增上故立為根者，於愛、見品諸煩惱中，受、想二法有增上用，想應如受亦立為根。又諸煩惱於能損壞善品等中有增上用應成根體。又最勝故建立諸根一切法中涅槃最勝何緣不立涅槃為根？」

The Śāstra states: "If because of sovereign efficacy ... because of their sovereign function," the author of the treatise provisionally sets up host and guest to resolve the objection. Herein there are two parts: first, positing the objection; second, properly resolving the objection. Within the objection, it first presents the objection from its own school, and next presents the objection from the Sāṃkhya. This is the first, presenting the objection from its own school. The Nyāyānusāra states: "If things are established as faculties because of sovereign efficacy, then among the defilements in the category of craving and views, the two dharmas of feeling and perception have a sovereign function; perception, like feeling, should also be established as a faculty. Furthermore, the defilements have a sovereign function in being able to destroy wholesome factors and the like, so they should constitute the entity of a faculty. Furthermore, since faculties are established because of being supreme, and among all dharmas nirvāṇa is the most supreme, for what reason is nirvāṇa not established as a faculty?"