俱舍論疏 4.140

4.140

論「為諸善士至能生怖故」，此釋第二無愧相也。「為諸善士所訶厭法說名為罪」者，出罪體也。即不善法無愧境也。「於此罪中不見怖畏」者，明無愧行相也。「此中怖言顯非愛果能生怖故」者，釋怖名也。此之怖言，因受果名，以不善果能生怖故，故名為怖。即是無愧不見惡果，名不見怖。惡果有二：一是現果，譏毀謫罰等；二異熟果，三惡道等。

The Śāstra says: "What is censured and rejected by good persons […] because it can produce fear." This explains the second, the characteristic of lack of modesty (anapatrāpya). "What is censured and rejected by good persons is called sin" identifies the entity of sin. That is, unwholesome dharmas are the objects of lack of modesty. "Not seeing fear in this sin" clarifies the mode of activity of lack of modesty. "Here, the word 'fear' indicates the undesirable fruit, because it can produce fear" explains the designation 'fear'. This word 'fear' is the cause taking the name of the effect, because the unwholesome fruit can generate fear, and is thus called fear. That is, lack of modesty does not see the evil fruit, which is called not seeing fear. Evil fruits are twofold: first, present fruits, such as ridicule, censure, punishment, and the like; second, maturation fruits, such as the three evil destinies and the like.