俱舍論疏 7.42

7.42

On the Śāstra's statement: "One should frame the four alternatives … the second alternative": this is the reply. In accordance with the previous third alternative, which was born from an equal-and-immediate condition and also immediate to the mind, this first alternative is born from the mind as equal-and-immediate, but not immediate to the absorption. The initial kṣaṇa of absorption and the state of mind are both born from the mind as equal-and-immediate, but because they do not arise immediately after the absorption, they constitute the present first alternative. The previous fourth was neither born from the mind as an equal-and-immediate condition nor immediate to the mind. The second kṣaṇa of the two absorptions and the four characteristics on the mind emerging from absorption are both not equal-and-immediate to the mind, but because they arise immediately after the absorption, they constitute the present second alternative.