俱舍論頌疏論本 23.79

23.79

從此第二，明住果非向，論云：「何緣先斷欲界修惑一至五等，至第十六道類智心，但說名為預流果等，非後果向（解云：此意者，何故斷五品非第二向，斷七八品非第三向，斷上七地非第四向也）？」頌曰：

From here, the second [part] explains abiding in fruit and not being an enterer. The śāstra states: "For what reason, having previously abandoned one to five [categories] of defilements of cultivation of the desire realm, when reaching the sixteenth mental moment of subsequent cognition of the path, is one only called a stream-enterer and so forth, and not an enterer upon a subsequent fruit? (The commentary explains: the meaning of this is, why is one who has abandoned five categories not an enterer upon the second [fruit], one who has abandoned seven or eight categories not an enterer upon the third [fruit], and one who has abandoned the upper seven grounds not an enterer upon the fourth [fruit]?)" The verse states: