俱舍論頌疏論本 4.78

4.78

第二、三類智邊世俗智等，等取相應心、心所也。謂入見道，至苦、集、滅三類智邊，能修未來俗智，起法前得得之。此言修者，是得修也，謂見道是無漏，俗智是有漏，故於見道俗智不起，勝緣闕故，得非擇滅（解云：勝緣者，是俗智所依身也。在見道中，唯有見道所依身，無俗智所依身，故勝緣闕耳）。俗智既畢竟不生，故無法俱法後得也。問：「何故三類智邊能修俗智，非道類智耶？」答：「二義故修：一、有事現觀故，謂世俗智於無始來曾知苦、斷集、證滅，今三類智亦知苦、斷集、證滅，與世俗智同為一事，故能修俗智等；二、當諦事周故，謂於三諦可遍知苦、可遍斷集、可遍證滅，當諦事周兼修俗智。於道類智不修俗智者，一俗智於道中曾無事現觀故；二無遍事現觀故，謂必無於道可能遍知、可能遍修，種性多故。」問：「何故於三諦有邊聲非道諦耶？」答：「以其能知一切苦、斷一切集、證一切滅，而無能修一切道。佛亦於道得修習修，俱不盡故，故無邊聲。」

In the second, "conventional knowledge flanking the three category knowledges and the like," "and the like" includes the associated mind and mental factors. Namely, upon entering the path of vision (darśana-mārga), when arriving alongside the category knowledges of suffering, origin, and cessation, one can cultivate future conventional knowledge, giving rise to acquisition prior to the dharma to acquire it. The "cultivation" spoken of here is cultivation by acquisition: because the path of vision is uncontaminated while conventional knowledge is contaminated, conventional knowledge does not arise during the path of vision; because superior conditions are deficient, one acquires non-analytical cessation (the explanation states: superior condition refers to the bodily support of conventional knowledge; during the path of vision, there is only the bodily support of the path of vision and no bodily support of conventional knowledge, hence superior conditions are deficient). Since conventional knowledge ultimately never arises, it lacks acquisition simultaneous with or subsequent to the dharma. Question: "Why does one cultivate conventional knowledge flanking the three category knowledges, but not at the category knowledge of the path?" Answer: "It is cultivated for two reasons: First, because there is active comprehension of factual matters: since beginningless time, conventional knowledge has known suffering, abandoned origin, and realized cessation; now the three category knowledges also know suffering, abandon origin, and realize cessation, sharing the identical factual matter with conventional knowledge, hence they can cultivate conventional knowledge, etc. Second, because the factual matters of the corresponding truths are completed: regarding the three truths, suffering can be completely known, origin can be completely abandoned, and cessation can be completely realized; the factual matters of the corresponding truths being completed, conventional knowledge is cultivated concurrently. As for not cultivating conventional knowledge at the category knowledge of the path: first, conventional knowledge never had active comprehension of factual matters regarding the path; second, there is no active comprehension of all factual matters, for there is never any complete knowledge or complete cultivation possible regarding the path, due to the multiplicity of spiritual dispositions." Question: "Why is the word 'flanking' used for the three truths, but not for the truth of the path?" Answer: "Because one can know all suffering, abandon all origin, and realize all cessation, but none can cultivate the entire path. Even the Buddha does not exhaust cultivation by acquisition and cultivation by habituation regarding the path; therefore, the word 'flanking' is not used."