瑜伽論記 1.393

1.393

第八文者，解云：麁重有三義，一、損惱義，唯染污法；二、無堪任義，亦通無記；三、性有漏義，通有漏善。善法種子無前二義，故不名麁重。然決擇說有自性業麁重，對法亦名有漏麁重，據第三義亦名麁重，是故一切所依自體即是異熟五蘊之身煩惱依附，名麁重所隨，無記種起名麁重所生，體是異熟無覆無記名麁重自性。

Regarding the eighth text: The explanation says that unfitness (dauṣṭhulya) has three meanings: 1. the meaning of damage and affliction, which applies only to defiled dharmas; 2. the meaning of unsuitability/incapacity, which also extends to indeterminate [dharmas]; 3. the meaning of having taints by nature, which extends to wholesome dharmas with taints. The seeds of wholesome dharmas lack the first two meanings, hence they are not called unfitness. However, the Viniścaya says there is an unfitness of inherent karma, and the Abhidharma also calls it the unfitness of having taints; based on the third meaning, it is also called unfitness. Therefore, all bodily bases of reliance—that is, the body of the five aggregates of maturation—being adhered to by defilements, are called "followed by unfitness"; when arisen from indeterminate seeds, they are called "produced by unfitness"; and in substance, being non-obscured indeterminate maturation, they are called "unfitness by intrinsic nature."