瑜伽論記 13.279

13.279

今解：轉識名通諸位，故隨體不起名不成就，賴耶名有永捨位，故據捨名名不成就，據義不同，故不為例。

The present explanation: the name "evolving consciousness" applies to all states, so according to the non-arising of its essence it is called non-possession. The name "ālaya" has a state of eternal abandonment, so it is called non-possession based on the abandonment of its name. Because their meanings differ, they do not serve as parallels.'