瑜伽論記 14.109

14.109

次辨非擇滅，泰云：彼於此終不更生，故暫不生時得非擇滅，然暫不生法後時遇緣還得生。言唯除未無餘等者，前明學人得，此明學人失，以未能斷愛種子，唯除此失未皆離也。景云：唯除未斷愛願種子故異無學，以此文證聖不造業。景云：無形二形等生者，此等取初果七生外餘一切生。若愛若願者，有二種。一、發業；二、潤生。潤生云愛，聖人由有，今此所無。謂發業者，願者，即是愛類，愛煩惱攝，準文唯除未無餘永害無明種子，願即愛也。或願者，願生天等，皆生死因故，聖人不起。測云：問，初二果人未斷欲界修所斷惑，迴小入大，有三界惑，何不受女身等耶？一解，亦得而論主約不迴向者故得非擇滅，非擇滅者既不定故。又解：不得。得竟不生故。

Next, differentiating uncalculated cessation. Tai says: Because they will never arise again in this [life], when they temporarily do not arise, one attains uncalculated cessation; however, dharmas that temporarily do not arise will later meet conditions and still be able to arise. Regarding 'only excluding those who have not [attained] without remainder,' etc.: previously it explained what those in training attain, and here it explains what those in training lose; because they have not yet severed the seeds of craving, only excluding this loss, they have not yet separated from all of them. Jing says: 'Only excluding unsevered seeds of craving and vows' is the reason they differ from those beyond training; this passage is taken as proof that noble ones do not generate karma. Jing says: As for 'birth as shapeless, with two shapes,' etc., these refer to all other births outside of the seven births of the first fruition. Regarding 'craving or vows,' there are two kinds: first, initiating karma; second, moistening birth. Moistening birth is called craving; because noble ones still have it, it is not what is referred to here. What is meant is initiating karma. Vows are of the same kind as craving, subsumed under the affliction of craving; according to the text, 'only excluding unsevered seeds of ignorance without remainder,' vows are just craving. Alternatively, vows are wishing to be born in the heavens, etc.; since these are all causes of birth and death, noble ones do not generate them. Ce asks: Those of the first and second fruitions have not yet severed the afflictions of the desire realm abandoned by cultivation; if they turn from the Hīnayāna to the Mahāyāna, they possess afflictions of the three realms—why do they not receive female bodies, etc.? One explanation: They can also receive them, but the author of the treatise, speaking in terms of those who do not redirect [their minds], speaks of their attaining uncalculated cessation, since uncalculated cessation is not fixed. Another explanation: They do not receive them, because having attained it, [such births] never arise.