瑜伽論記 14.277

14.277

基云：此中法處遍據實者說。若爾，色等中亦有假者應同法處，又觸所造全假何故不遍言？義曰：不然，可受用故，法處餘假不可取用故，色等中雖假，仍彼識等別緣法處中，唯第六緣故不為倒，又依俱生故不例。又觸處若即與大俱者亦簡其法處，不如此等故不論。

Ji says: Here, the dharma-base is universally stated in terms of real entities. If that were so, then within visible form, etc., there are also provisional ones, so they should be identical to the dharma-base; moreover, the tactilely derived forms are entirely provisional, so why are they not universally stated? The meaning is: It is not so, because they can be experienced, whereas the other provisional forms in the dharma-base cannot be grasped for use. Although they are provisional within visible form, etc., they are still individually cognized by their respective consciousnesses, etc., whereas in the dharma-base they are cognized solely by the sixth consciousness; therefore, it is not an error. Moreover, because they arise in dependence on coexistence, they are not analogous. Furthermore, if the tactile base directly coexists with the primary elements, it is also distinguished from the dharma-base; because they are not like these, they are not discussed.