瑜伽論記 14.76

14.76

泰云：不共住者，犯重人也。若別住者，上明意樂損害中云：或畏不活法，比丘中詐現自辨與彼同法，勿諸比丘與我同止，名別異住。前取意樂損害，此取白法損義，亦可沙彌犯十三，亦是住僧殘，房舍臥具名別住，十戒中雖無僧殘罪，以廣律中皆通結沙彌罪，故知亦有戒也。

Tai says: One who does not cohabit is a person who has committed a grave offense. Regarding one who lives separately: above in explaining impairment of intention it says, 'Or fearing the Dharma of non-livelihood, pretending to distinguish oneself among monks as having the same Dharma with them, so that monks would not dwell together with me,' which is called living separately. The former takes impairment of intention; this takes the meaning of impairment of wholesome states. It can also be that a novice committing thirteen [offenses] also constitutes living in saṃghāvaśeṣa, where dwellings and bedding are called separate living. Although there are no saṃghāvaśeṣa offenses in the ten precepts, because throughout the extensive Vinaya all are applied to formulate offenses for novices, we know that there are also precepts.