瑜伽論記 16.439

16.439

第三重解本惑中，貪瞋、慢疑，互不相應等者，景云：問：前說無明與一切煩惱相應，乃至貪瞋互不相應，而貪與見慢互得相應，如貪染時或搆方高舉等，前後相違云何通耶？解云：貪慢見本地，若猛盛則不相應，若不猛盛相隨順起則得相應，各據一義，故不相違。

In the third reiterative explanation of the root defilements, regarding 'greed, anger, conceit, and doubt are not mutually conjoined, and so forth': Jing says: 'Question: Earlier it was said that ignorance is conjoined with all defilements, up to greed and anger not being mutually conjoined, whereas greed, views, and conceit can be mutually conjoined, as when in the midst of greedy attachment one may plan and hold oneself high, and so on; how can this contradiction between earlier and later be resolved? Explanation: In their basic state, if greed, conceit, and views are fierce, they are not conjoined; if they are not fierce and arise in mutual compliance, then they can be conjoined. Each is based on one perspective, so they do not contradict each other.'