瑜伽論記 16.530

16.530

應立量云：見道等觀品應非對治體性（宗），煩惱種子隨遂生故（因），如有漏心法（喻）。由此違量道理，故薄伽梵說乃至名住無相，此中第六住無相，與對法第九不同。如彼說見道十六心皆是隨信法行，入至果位名信解等，即第十六心是信解亦在見道中，何故此言無想者入見道即除信解，豈除第十六見道耶？

One should formulate a syllogism: The category of discernment, such as the path of seeing, should not be an intrinsic nature of an antidote (thesis); because seeds of affliction follow along with it and arise (reason); like defiled mental dharmas (example). Because of this reasoning that contradicts the syllogism, the Bhagavān said up to 'named abiding in the signless.' Here, the sixth's abiding in the signless differs from the ninth [fascicle] of the Abhidharma. As that text says, the sixteen minds of the path of seeing are all followers through faith or followers of Dharma, and upon entering the state of fruition they are named those resolved through faith, etc.; that is, the sixteenth mind is one resolved through faith and is also within the path of seeing. Why does this text say that the non-conceptual entering the path of seeing excludes those resolved through faith? Could it exclude the sixteenth mind of the path of seeing?