瑜伽論記 18.113

18.113

基云：有解，第一因證依他在此，第二因證圓成有，以此等名真如之別義名，更無別目也。又解：此三故字亦證依他，實物故簡似法事故體事也。義故差別義，皆依他起。

Ji says: One explanation is that the first reason proves that the paratantra resides here, and the second reason proves that the pariniṣpanna exists, because these are distinct nominal designations for tathatā, and there is no other reference. Another explanation is: These three occurrences of the word "because" also prove the paratantra: "because they are substantial entities" excludes apparent phenomena; "because of facts/phenomena" refers to actual phenomena of the substance; "because of referents/meanings" refers to differentiated meanings; all of them are paratantra-arisen.