瑜伽論記 18.517

18.517

第七解觀察中，言此中一向雜染所犯，謂諸性罪者，此解初句。應當一向教令不犯至令速悔除者，此解第二一向不行。應是九十中犯性罪者，令速悔除令不復行。又佛世尊至制立遮罪學處者，此解第三因有犯人制立學處故。若有所餘至應為顯示對治之者，此解第四現彼過失生不生故，若在餘方餘時餘人同犯此罪名生，示前佛制遮罪學處而對除之名為不生。若有不犯至亦不應顯對治之法者，此解第五非一向現行。

In the seventh [section], explaining examination: the words 'Herein, offenses that are solely defiled refer to the inherent offenses' explain the first clause. From 'One should solely instruct them not to commit offenses' down to 'causing them to quickly repent and remove [them]' explains the second, 'solely non-engaging'. Offenses among the ninety that are inherent offenses are to be quickly repented and removed so that they are not committed again. Furthermore, from 'the Buddha, the World-Honoured One' down to 'established the training rules on prohibitive offenses' explains the third, 'because of individuals who commit offenses, training rules are established'. From 'If there are any remaining' down to 'one should reveal the antidotes for them' explains the fourth, 'because of the arising or non-arising of their faults'. If in another place, at another time, other persons commit the same offense, this is called 'arising'; showing the previously Buddha-established prohibitive training rule and remedying/removing it is called 'non-arising'. From 'If there are those who do not offend' down to 'nor should one reveal the dharmas of antidote' explains the fifth, 'not solely occurring in actuality'.