瑜伽論記 19.427

19.427

問：相無自性無遍計所執相之自性名相無性，依他無彼橫計自然之生名生無性，此亦遣無於遍計所執，即此依他無彼勝義常住之性名勝義無性，此亦先於遍計所執，是即三無并無遍計，總是一無，但應說彼相無自性其義即是，何須復辨此依他無生無勝義等耶？

Question: Naturelessness of character means being without the intrinsic nature of the parikalpita character, hence called character-naturelessness; paratantra is devoid of that falsely reckoned spontaneous arising, hence called arising-naturelessness, which also dispels and negates the parikalpita; and this very paratantra is devoid of that ultimate, permanent nature, hence called ultimate naturelessness, which also dispels the parikalpita. Thus the three naturelessnesses together negate the parikalpita, being entirely a single negation. It should only be necessary to state that naturelessness of character, and the meaning would be complete; why is it necessary to further distinguish that paratantra is without arising, without ultimate truth, and so forth?