瑜伽論記 19.428

19.428

解云：據理實然并約無其遍計所執。然今論宗或約二性如辨三無或約三性辨三無者，總別分別故有其三，相無自性，即是總收其遍計所執皆盡。復言依他無生無勝義等，是別分別。

The explanation says: In terms of principle, this is indeed so, and all are stated in terms of negating the parikalpita. However, the tenets of this treatise distinguish the three naturelessnesses either in terms of two natures or in terms of three natures; because of the distinction between general and particular, there are three of them. Naturelessness of character is the general subsumption that exhausts the parikalpita entirely. Stating again that paratantra is without arising, without ultimate truth, and so forth, is the particular differentiation.