瑜伽論記 19.485

19.485

下通違經，世尊於餘經中說：緣不執著遍計所執自性，此牒經文。論主前圓成緣遍計所執自性，何故餘經說彼圓成緣不執著遍計所執。言應知此性者，今至此義中當知依相說者，論主為通，應知。餘經說：圓成實緣下，執著遍計所執，依已證得清淨圓成實說，依不執著相說。今此中說圓成實性遍計所執者，依未證得清淨圓成執著相說。

Below, resolving contradictions with scriptures: The World-Honoured One in other sūtras says: 'Taking non-adherence to the parikalpita intrinsic nature as cognitive condition'—this repeats the sūtra text. Previously, the author of the treatise stated that pariniṣpanna takes the parikalpita intrinsic nature as its cognitive condition; why do other sūtras state that pariniṣpanna takes non-adherence to parikalpita as its cognitive condition? Regarding 'One should know that this nature', 'now coming to this meaning, one should know that it is spoken of based on marks'—the author of the treatise resolves this: one should know that other sūtras say that pariniṣpanna has non-adherence to parikalpita as its cognitive condition based on the pariniṣpanna that has already attained purity, spoken of based on the mark of non-adherence. What is stated here now, that the pariniṣpanna nature [takes] parikalpita [as cognitive condition], is spoken of based on the mark of adherence where pure pariniṣpanna has not yet been attained.