瑜伽論記 2.280

2.280

第三難中，若不異相者，由與彼因無差別故，亦應常是等者，彼本計云：所生麁色不越因量故，難果亦應常無異相故，如因故，無決定。若從離散，應一切時一切果生等者，成劫之時聚色，若從散別極微生，則空劫時所有極微皆能生果，因恒有故，如劫成時，非但成時為因有果，故成因果無決定義。上已設遮，下破本計。

In the third challenge, regarding "if not of a different characteristic, because there is no distinction from that cause, it should also always be..." and so forth: Their original doctrine posits that the produced coarse form does not exceed the measure of its cause; therefore the effect is challenged as also necessarily being permanent and without distinct characteristics, like the cause, and hence there would be no determination. Regarding "if from dispersal, all effects should arise at all times," and so forth: Aggregated form at the time of the aeon of formation, if produced from dispersed, distinct atoms, then all the atoms at the time of the aeon of emptiness would all be able to produce effects, because the cause is always present, just as at the time of the aeon's formation. It is not only at the time of formation that there is an effect due to a cause, and thus the establishment of cause and effect lacks determination. The above has set forth the refutations; below, their original doctrine is refuted.