瑜伽論記 20.16

20.16

備師等云：如攝論說：分別性凡夫境界，真實性聖人境界。依他起性凡聖境界者，約遍計情故說所行論及攝論又說三性皆名應知者，智遍計無故名為知。依他起性凡聖二智所行但非正智境，圓成實唯正智所緣非後智境，如論真如相分是依他性故。準此文，賴耶所緣諸識非緣緣。

Master Bei and others say: As the Mahāyānasaṃgraha says, 'The discriminated nature is the realm of ordinary persons; the true nature is the realm of noble ones; the dependent nature is the realm of both ordinary persons and noble ones'—this states the domain based on conceptual grasping. When the treatise and the Mahāyānasaṃgraha also say that the three natures are all called what should be known, it is called 'known' because cognition thoroughly knows parikalpita as non-existent. The paratantra nature is the domain of both ordinary and noble cognitions, but is not the object of correct cognition; pariniṣpanna is solely the object of correct cognition and not the domain of subsequently attained cognition, because as the treatise says, the image-aspect of tathatā is the paratantra nature. In accordance with this text, the various consciousnesses that are objects of the ālayavijñāna are not objective conditions.