瑜伽論記 21.107

21.107

備云：初釋第三相；二釋第四相，即共不定；三釋第一相，即是同品一分轉異品譬喻遍轉故，於所立宗非決定故，名非圓滿；四釋第二相，即是異品一分轉同品譬喻遍轉故，於所成宗亦不決定，五釋第六相，六釋第五及第七相，如其次第異類所引故，非善言教，體性皆不清淨。

Bei says: First, it explains the third characteristic; second, it explains the fourth characteristic, which is the common inconclusive; third, it explains the first characteristic, which is occurring in a part of the sapakṣa and pervading the vipakṣa in an analogy, and because it is not decisive regarding the thesis to be established, it is called non-complete; fourth, it explains the second characteristic, which is occurring in a part of the vipakṣa and pervading the sapakṣa in an analogy, and thus it is also not decisive regarding the thesis to be proven; fifth, it explains the sixth characteristic; sixth, it explains the fifth and seventh characteristics, which, in accordance with their order, are drawn from a different class, hence they are not good spoken teachings and their intrinsic nature is entirely unpurified.