瑜伽論記 3.230

3.230

何等受不有故愛不有，及至如行緣識道理者，（景云）：此緣妄樂生愛，如因邪行生顛倒識，故同相類。（基云：）問：受是果愛是煩惱，行是業識是果，全不相似，云何類同？

Regarding 'What feeling being absent does craving not exist, up to [the principle that feeling with craving as condition is] just like the principle of volitional formations conditioned by consciousness,' (Jing says): Here, conditioned by illusory pleasure, craving arises, just as based on improper formations inverted consciousness arises; therefore they are analogous in kind. (Ji says:) Question: Feeling is a fruit and craving is an affliction; volitional formation is karma and consciousness is a fruit. They are completely dissimilar; how can they be classified as analogous?