瑜伽論記 3.231

3.231

答：行與識業果異故異性相望，今受與愛果惑雖別異性亦同故指無別，如從業生異熟異熟生煩惱，為類同故義不相違。宗師解云：如以無明為緣行與識為緣彼滅故識滅，亦以無明觸為緣受與愛為緣彼滅故愛滅；義相似故為類也。

Answer: Because volitional formation and consciousness differ as karma and fruit, they are viewed across differing natures; here, although feeling and craving differ as fruit and delusion, their differing natures are likewise the same, and hence are designated without difference. Just as from karma ripening is produced, and from ripening affliction is produced, in being analogous kinds their meaning is not contradictory. Master Zong explains: Just as with ignorance as condition volitional formations serve as condition for consciousness, and through the cessation of that [ignorance] consciousness ceases, likewise with ignorance-contact as condition feeling serves as condition for craving, and through the cessation of that [ignorance-contact] craving ceases; because their senses are similar, they are made analogous.