瑜伽論記 4.361

4.361

然此文中，釋自體智云：無漏故名聖，豈言唯是異生者定乎，今尋文相，亦可善故名聖即在異生位，無漏故名聖在於聖位，此非純聖，故第二智方名非凡所近也。

However, in this text, explaining the knowledge of intrinsic nature, it says: 'Being taintless, it is called noble.' How could one say that it is solely the concentration of worldlings? Now, examining the phrasing of the text, it is also acceptable that being wholesome it is called noble, which is in the stage of worldlings, and being taintless it is called noble, which is in the stage of noble ones. Since this is not purely noble, only the second knowledge is called 'not approached by ordinary beings.'