瑜伽論記 5.346

5.346

第六段一頌。釋中，心相應亦爾，無實相應隨轉之性，非無假法。又相應者謂同性，不相應者謂別性，非同性者或不相應，非異性者或非不相應，由此故知無實隨轉性，以上釋初二句。又非一心或相應或不相應者，釋下二句，於相應中又非一切定與一切相應，若一切不相應亦非定不相應。於勝義諦中，無實相應、不相應義故。

The sixth section consists of one verse. In the explanation, mental conjunction is also like this: it lacks an intrinsically real nature of conjoined progression, yet it is not without conventional phenomena. Furthermore, "conjoined" refers to the same nature, and "unconjoined" refers to a distinct nature; what is not of the same nature may be unconjoined, and what is not of a different nature may not be unconjoined. From this it is known that there is no real nature of conjoined progression. The above explains the first two lines. Furthermore, "nor is a single mind either conjoined or unconjoined" explains the lower two lines: in conjunction, it is not the case that all are definitively conjoined with all; and if all are unconjoined, it is also not the case that they are definitively unconjoined. This is because in ultimate truth, there is no real meaning of conjunction or non-conjunction.