瑜伽師地論略纂 7.21

7.21

第六段一頌，釋中心相應亦爾，無實相應隨轉之性，非無假法。　又相應者，謂同性；不相應者，謂別性。非同性者，或不相應；非異性者，或非不相應。由此故知，無實隨轉性。釋上初二句。　「又非一切心，或相應，或不相應」者，釋下二句。於相應中，又非一切定與一切相應；若此時不相應，亦非一切定不相應。於勝義諦中，無實相應不相應義故。

In the sixth section, which has one verse, the commentary explains that the association of mind is also like this: it lacks an intrinsically real nature of association and accompanying functioning, yet it is not devoid of designated phenomena. Furthermore, 'associated' means of the same nature; 'unassociated' means of different natures. That which is not of the same nature may be unassociated; that which is not of a different nature may be not unassociated. From this one knows that there is no real nature of accompanying functioning. This explains the first two lines above. 'Moreover, not all minds are either associated or unassociated' explains the lower two lines. Among associations, not all are definitely associated with everything; if at this time it is unassociated, it is also not the case that all are definitely unassociated. This is because in the ultimate truth, there is no real meaning of association or non-association.