瑜伽論記 7.398

7.398

如下言調順寂靜是二種定，今言安住近住亦明收二種，非安住放近住中解，若爾，何故言及即於此相續澄淨方便等遍安住之言？

Just as it is said below that 'tamed and calmed' are two kinds of concentration (samādhi), here the statement 'settled abiding and proximate abiding' also clearly subsumes two kinds; settled abiding is not to be interpreted by subsuming it under proximate abiding. If that were so, why would it say, 'and right within this, through continuous, clearing expedient means, equally and universally settling'?