瑜伽論記 8.333

8.333

言一切聲聞獨覺種姓唯能當證煩惱障淨等者，問：何故前立宗中云菩薩種姓尚過一切聲聞獨覺等，下釋中即云聲聞等種姓唯證煩惱障淨，菩薩種姓當證二障淨等，此文則說過二乘因，何故前後相違？解云：此影略互顯亦無妨也，亦可舉種姓明果，不欲明種姓。

Regarding the statement that 'all śrāvaka and pratyekabuddha gotras are only able to realize purification from the affliction obscuration, etc.': Question: Why did the earlier thesis state that the bodhisattva gotra surpasses all śrāvakas and pratyekabuddhas, while the explanation below states that the gotra of śrāvakas and others only realizes purification from the affliction obscuration, and the bodhisattva gotra will realize purification from both obscurations, etc.? This text then speaks of surpassing the causes of the two vehicles; why do the earlier and later contradict each other? The explanation says: This is a mutual ellipsis and mutual illustration, so there is no contradiction. Alternatively, it may be that it raises the gotra to illustrate the fruit, not intending to illustrate the gotra itself.