瑜伽論記 9.139

9.139

前中有二，初有三復次以理廣破；二、由此因緣已下，結破類通。前中，初復次正破立宗，復二復次破其救義，又此三復次即顯三失，一隨名多體失，二名前無體失，三名前生覺失。

In the first part there are two: first, there are three further arguments that extensively refute with reasoning; second, from "For this reason" onward, it concludes the refutation and generalizes the application. In the first part, the first argument directly refutes the established tenet; the next two arguments refute their rescue attempts. Furthermore, these three arguments demonstrate three fallacies: first, the fallacy of multiple entities following multiple names; second, the fallacy of nonexistence of an entity prior to a name; third, the fallacy of cognition arising prior to a name.