瑜伽論記 9.324

9.324

今問：此論文相卷大如小舒小如大，而彼經說芥子納須彌者，非卷大舒小而相容受，經論似違，如何會？

Now the question is asked: The phrasing of this treatise text rolls up the large into the small and expands the small into the large, whereas that sūtra speaks of a mustard seed containing Mount Sumeru without rolling up the large or expanding the small to accommodate each other. The sūtra and the treatise seem to contradict each other; how are they to be reconciled?