瑜伽師地論略纂 10.78

10.78

論云如是諸法，非有自性如言所說，亦非一切都無所有，如前所計，如言所說非有自性之法，如所執者非有；如依他妄法假立名言，此法亦非一切都無所有，不可無依他等。非有自性者，謂遍計所執；如言所說，亦非一切都無所有者，謂依他等有也。非但依他離言法是有，其所執非有之法有妄情在故，亦非一切都無所有，所以第二、論云如是非有，亦非一切都無所有。上來既明所計非有，依他、圓成是有故。

The treatise states: "Such dharmas do not have an intrinsic nature as spoken of in words, nor are they entirely nonexistent." As previously grasped, dharmas lacking intrinsic nature as spoken of in words do not exist as imagined; yet as names are nominally posited based on other-dependent erroneous dharmas, these dharmas are also not entirely nonexistent, for it is impossible that other-dependent nature and so forth do not exist. "Lacking an intrinsic nature" refers to the imaginary nature; "as spoken of in words, nor are they entirely nonexistent" refers to the existence of other-dependent nature and so forth. Not only are other-dependent, ineffable dharmas existent, but because the erroneous cognitive affective state exists in those grasped nonexistent dharmas, they are also not entirely nonexistent. Therefore, second, the treatise states that as such they are nonexistent, nor are they entirely nonexistent. The above has already clarified that what is imagined is nonexistent, whereas other-dependent nature and consummate nature exist.