瑜伽師地論略纂 12.124

12.124

論云「於一切種諸佛聖教，一切外道及諸魔軍等，不能引奪」者，何故前初地非他所引，今後論之？且義：前初地謂真如教非他引，或一切教非他引，即總想非他引，非別相非他引。今此於一切種聖教非他引，別相中非他引也。今此地中，加瑠璃寶珠，於前具上莊也。即一切地，准此當知。

Regarding the treatise stating 'With respect to the holy teachings of all Buddhas of all kinds, all non-Buddhists, the armies of Māra, and so forth cannot mislead or deprive them': Why was it said earlier in the First Bhūmi that they cannot be misled by others, and now it is discussed again? A provisional interpretation: Earlier in the First Bhūmi it meant that they could not be misled regarding the teaching of thusness, or regarding all teachings in general—that is, they could not be misled regarding general characteristics, but not that they could not be misled regarding specific characteristics. Now, here, they cannot be misled regarding holy teachings of all kinds, meaning they cannot be misled among specific characteristics. Now in this bhūmi, a vaiḍūrya jewel is added, adorning the previous implements. Thus for all bhūmis, one should understand them by analogy to this.