瑜伽師地論略纂 12.52

12.52

論云「若言異者，如是即應非行生生；是行生生，不應道理」者，非行生生即小生也，是行生生即大生也。汝若言大生、小生異者，即應小生亦似大生，應能生色。大生生色法，亦能生小生，小生大生，應亦生色法，故小生非行生生，能生色法，應是大生行生生。故二生異，不應道理。

The śāstra states: "If one says they are distinct, then it would not be that the arising of formations produces [formations]; that the arising of formations produces [formations] is unreasonable." That which is not the arising of formations producing [formations] is secondary arising; that which is the arising of formations producing [formations] is primary arising. If you say that primary arising and secondary arising are distinct, then secondary arising should also be like primary arising and be able to produce form. Primary arising produces material phenomena and can also produce secondary arising; if secondary arising produces primary arising, it should also produce material phenomena; therefore, secondary arising, not being the arising of formations that produces [formations], if able to produce material phenomena, should be primary arising, the arising of formations that produces [formations]. Therefore, that the two arisings are distinct is unreasonable.