瑜伽師地論略纂 14.69

14.69

論云「觸為何業？謂受、想、思所依為業」，如餘處《對法》等唯是受依，何不言想、思等？此彼別者，此據通論，皆依於觸，觸次作意後生故。若據相隨轉，雖即唯受，此據此不為例耶。如《俱舍》第一卷解。　「受為何業？愛生所依為業」，謂境界等愛皆由受後方生。

Regarding the treatise's statement, 'What is the function of contact? It has the function of serving as the basis for feeling, perception, and volition,' why does it say in other places, such as the Abhidharma, that it is exclusively the basis of feeling, and not mention perception, volition, and the like? The difference between this and that is: here it is discussed generally, all relying upon contact, because contact arises immediately after manaskāra. If based on following and conforming, although it is strictly feeling alone, this [general statement] here does not serve as an exception to that, does it? This is as explained in the first fascicle of the Kośa. Regarding 'What is the function of feeling? It has the function of serving as the basis for the arising of craving,' this means that cravings for objects and the like all arise only subsequent to feeling.