瑜伽師地論略纂 14.75

14.75

論云「善法有六依處，謂決定等」下，解頌中第三門相應中自辨。又初帙第三卷此善等非一切耶，又下六十中云於十境生，勘與此不同，至彼文自會。若在不定地，起善心時，必與十數俱起；若在定地，必與十一俱，謂輕安唯在定地起故。豈不與此相違耶？有義：據實一切時在不定地，起善心必十；若在定，與十一為正。此處等據增上時得名，非無餘者，此不相違也。

The treatise says: "Wholesome dharmas have six bases, namely determination..." and below; this is explained in the verses below under the third category, "association." Furthermore, in the third fascicle of the first division, are these wholesomes not all-inclusive? Again, in fascicle sixty below it states that they arise regarding ten objects; checking this against that text shows differences, which will be reconciled when reaching that text. If one is in an unconcentrated plane, when a wholesome mind arises, it must arise together with ten [mental factors]; if in a concentrated plane, it must arise with eleven, because pliancy arises only in a concentrated plane. Does this not conflict with this [passage]? Some say: fundamentally, at all times in an unconcentrated plane, the arising of a wholesome mind definitely has ten; if in concentration, having eleven is correct. These bases and the like are named on the basis of their predominant states, not that the others are absent, so there is no contradiction.