瑜伽師地論略纂 14.93

14.93

論無記中云「謂威儀、工巧，或於一時展轉相應」者，如下假實中云無記心於異熟生心上假施設有，故此三無記不說與異熟心相應耶？此中有義：若威儀、工巧，一心發二境，若異熟等心施設三無記即不如是，不相違也。

In the discussion of the unspecified, the treatise says, "namely, deportment and craftsmanship, or they mutually associate at one time": as it says below regarding the provisional and real, the unspecified mind is provisionally posited upon the mind born of fruition; is this why these three unspecified are not said to be associated with the fruition mind? In this, there is an interpretation: deportment and craftsmanship can be generated toward two objects by a single mind, but when the fruition mind, etc., posit the three unspecified, it is not like this, so there is no contradiction.