瑜伽師地論略纂 15.121

15.121

論云「又有橫計諸邪解脫所有邪見，是迷滅邪見」者，小乘此云迷苦邪見，滅下邪見要無漏緣。今者此文亦別緣餘有漏法，是滅邪見。道中，非道計道亦爾，以迷道中故，方計有別道，故名是道諦斷。准此正於翻迷故，而別有執。若總緣四諦見為見取，太師云：此通四諦下斷戒取亦爾。若爾，我見應亦爾。有餘二諦皆有遍果因，以遍緣五門起故。今解：總緣四諦見為見取者，即苦諦下見取，餘諦俱能別緣，如前我說。　問曰：不爾，如此邪見，別計有邪解脫，亦是迷有漏苦，如何見滅斷？答曰：迷滅執別有滅，乃至道亦爾，義增故，唯見滅斷，前苦諦下無別說此見故也。

The treatise says: "Furthermore, all wrong views that arbitrarily grasp various false liberations are wrong views that err concerning cessation." The Hīnayāna calls this a wrong view that errs concerning suffering; for them, a wrong view under cessation must take the untainted as its cognitive object. Now, this text also states that separately taking other tainted dharmas as cognitive objects constitutes a wrong view regarding cessation. Within the path, grasping what is not the path as the path is also like this: because one errs concerning the path, one only then grasps that there is a separate path; therefore it is said to be abandoned through [seeing] the truth of the path. Following this, it is precisely because one turns away and errs that one has a separate grasping. If one generally takes the views of the four truths as the object of the grasp of views, the Great Master says: this applies to being abandoned under all four truths; the grasp of precepts and vows is also like this. If so, the view of self should also be like this. The remaining two truths both possess universal fruits and causes, because they arise by universally taking the five gates as their cognitive objects. Our present explanation is: that which generally takes the views of the four truths as the grasp of views is the grasp of views under the truth of suffering; regarding the other truths, all can separately take them as objects, as I have said before. Question: If that is not so, when such a wrong view separately grasps a false liberation, it is also erring concerning tainted suffering; how then is it abandoned through seeing cessation? Answer: Because erring concerning cessation and grasping that there is a separate cessation—and so on up to the path as well—has an intensified meaning, it is abandoned solely through seeing cessation; this is because under the truth of suffering earlier, this view was not separately explained.