瑜伽師地論略纂 3.73

3.73

第二段、破極微中有五：初難中，「若已觀察，違諸量故」者，現、比二量所不得故，猶如兔角，定非實有。彼宗雖計現量所得，此宗說非空劫逈色，但有阿拏已上麁色現量可得，非極微故。小乘雖言輪王及天眼二現量得，然非我許，虛搆成故。

In the second section, refuting atoms (paramāṇu), there are five [arguments]. In the first objection, regarding "If it has already been investigated, it contradicts the pramāṇas": because it is unobtainable by both direct perception (pratyakṣa) and inference (anumāna), just like a hare's horn, it is definitely not real. Although that school posits that it is obtained by direct perception, this school states that apart from empty-eon distant form, there are only coarse forms from aņu onwards that can be obtained by direct perception, not atoms. Although the Hīnayāna says that the wheel-turning king and the divine eye both obtain it by direct perception, it is not accepted by us, being a fictitious construction.