Pramāṇa · Search · About · API

成唯識論述記 8.330

成唯識論述記 8.330

Language
Classical Chinese

8.330

九、取支,通取一切煩惱,《瑜伽論》說:一切煩惱令生續故,即通見、修所有煩惱令生相續。又下文說:「正唯修斷,助潤通見,論文多據四取為體。在家、出家二諍本故,四取以三見及貪為體。」《大論》第十及九十三等云:欲取云何謂欲貪?見取、戒禁取、我語取即三見故也。諸在家者以欲貪為先而興諍故;諸出家者依三見為先而興諍故。《瑜伽》上下四取體三文不同:一、唯取四取是四取體;二、緣四取貪為四取體;三、若能取、若所取、若所為取皆四取體。今此合取,所說義別,故無妨難,勘別抄也。問:若爾,何故《十地經》等云愛增名取?答:下自會言,雖取支中攝諸煩惱,而愛潤勝,說是愛增,非無餘惑,此通種、現,《十地經》說故,如愛引證。

Ninth, the branch of grasping (upādāna) generally takes all afflictions (kleśa) [as its entity]. The Yogācāra-śāstra says: 'Because all afflictions cause birth to continue', this encompasses all afflictions abandoned by seeing (darśana-heya) and by cultivation (bhāvanā-heya) that cause birth to continue. Furthermore, a later passage states: 'Primarily it is only what is abandoned by cultivation, while assisting in moistening extends to what is abandoned by seeing; the treatises mostly rely on the four graspings as its entity. Because they are the root of the two disputes among householders and renunciants, the four graspings take the three views and greed as their entity.' The tenth and ninety-third fascicles of the Great Treatise and so forth state: 'What is grasping at sensual pleasures (kāmopādāna)? It means greed for sensual pleasures. Grasping at views (dṛṣṭy-upādāna), grasping at precepts and vows (śīlavratopādāna), and grasping at the assertion of a self (ātmavādopādāna) are the three views.' Householders engage in dispute taking greed for sensual pleasures as primary; renunciants engage in dispute taking the three views as primary. Across the Yogācāra, the entity of the four graspings is stated differently in three texts: first, only the four graspings themselves are the entity of the four graspings; second, greed directed toward the four graspings is the entity of the four graspings; third, whether the grasper, the grasped, or that for the sake of which one grasps, all are the entity of the four graspings. Here they are combined; because the intended meanings differ, there is no contradiction—examine the separate notes. Question: If so, why do the Daśabhūmika-sūtra and other texts say that the increase of craving is called grasping? Answer: Below [the treatise] will itself reconcile this, stating that although the branch of grasping subsumes all afflictions, because craving's moistening is predominant it is described as the increase of craving, not that other afflictions are absent. This extends to both seeds and manifest [states], because the Daśabhūmika-sūtra says so, just as cited for craving.

English (machine translation) (machine translation)

Translations (1)