成唯識論述記 7.57

7.57

The Commentary states: First it refutes the previous master, and then sets forth its own interpretation; the refutation of the other can be understood. Setting forth the correct interpretation: the aforementioned greed and so on, anger and so on, have fundamental afflictions (kleśa) and secondary afflictions (upakleśa), which constitute the first 'two'. Below it explains the latter 'two': each possesses the two natures of unwholesomeness and indeterminacy. Alternatively explained: or again, these two each have the two aspects of manifest entanglements and seed-based dormant dispositions.