成唯識論掌中樞要 2.132

2.132

生在下地，起無色界幾煩惱？唯起於六或七，謂：見取、慢、疑、愛、癡及我見。若定，若生，不過爾故。又可起彼戒取，執彼定為勝因故。無起彼邪見及邊見文，不同色界有六十二見等故。生欲起色界定，五散中謂身、邊、慢、愛、疑、二取，不見起耶見之相。二無因論亦是定後起彼耶見，九皆容起，並起戒取，執彼定為勝因故。然無此文：生無色界除下潤生我，貪、慢二見、癡，餘更不得起，彼無中有可說起謗等故。生無色界唯起下俱生，無起分別相，無中有起謗故。

Being born in a lower plane, how many defilements of the formless realm can arise? Only six or seven arise, namely: view-attachment, conceit, doubt, attachment (rāga), delusion, and self-view. Whether in absorption or in rebirth, it does not exceed these. Furthermore, precept-attachment of that [realm] can also arise, because of clinging to that absorption as a supreme cause. There is no text mentioning the arising of wrong view or extreme view of that realm, unlike the form realm which has the sixty-two views and so forth. Being born in the desire realm and giving rise to the absorption of the form realm, among the five distractions—namely [views of] body, extremes, conceit, attachment, doubt, and the two attachments—no characteristic of giving rise to wrong view is seen. The two theories of causelessness are also the arising of that wrong view after absorption; all nine are capable of arising, along with the arising of precept-attachment, because of clinging to that absorption as a supreme cause. However, there is no such text stating that being born in the formless realm, aside from the lower self that moistens rebirth, craving, conceit, the two views, and delusion, the rest can never arise, because there is no intermediate existence there where one could be said to give rise to denigration and the like. Being born in the formless realm, only the lower innate [defilements] arise; there is no mark of arising conceptual discriminations, because there is no intermediate existence to give rise to denigration.